Fuel consumption Puma

All Ford Puma related discussions
potentialbuyer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 12:27 pm

Post by potentialbuyer »

Since the 125 vs 155 thread has been closed for some reason I will continue here with the gathering of data so we get a good average of the fuel consumption. So if you have data feel free to post them here preferably with your driving style, distance you drove during your measurement, driving modes and which engine you have. I will update the table. The more data the more accurate the average will be.

Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 01.17.54.png

cianpars
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:21 pm

Post by cianpars »

Over my first 2000 miles, my car indicates 52 mpg but the Fordpass app says I've been getting 55 mpg (not sure which to believe).

I have a Puma 125 ST line X but most of my driving is out of town and I avoid peak times. My previous B Max 125 Ecoboost showed 46.5 mpg over 4.5 years and 40k miles in similar driving conditiions as a comparison which was a bit better than I used to get from my 1.25 cc Fiesta before that.

Ford dealer says they get 45 to 50 mpg from their fleet Pumas, though they get driven quite hard.

From what I see and read, there is very little difference between the consumption of the 125 and 155.
Deleted User 702

Post by Deleted User 702 »

From manually calculating the fuel consumption I'd say the App was way out and the on-board trips were optimistic to the tune of around 10%.
User avatar
Sparks
Posts: 4229
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2020 5:40 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Post by Sparks »

I see mines pretty low on the list.... :lol:
Just done 220 mile drive over the weekend and the car is saying I averaged 52.3 MPG for trip. No Motorways were used Just A and B roads.
All done in Normal mode, my wife wanted a relaxed drive so no 'Sport'. :cry:
Ford Puma ST-Line Vignale 155 Automatic.
Driver Assistance Pack. Power Tailgate etc. etc....Frozen White. 🚷🚳
Wireless Android Auto. 8-)
Previous Puma ST-Line X First Edition.
potentialbuyer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 12:27 pm

Post by potentialbuyer »

Update :

Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 14.14.49.png

Thrillhouse
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:29 pm

Post by Thrillhouse »

St line x 125 manual

Over 2500 miles I'm getting 40.7

Daily commute on a roads and M25, sometimes spirited driving but never too crazy on the revs
Vin
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 10:56 am

Post by Vin »

Done a 120 round trip last weekend not a fun fast drive but not driving like an old lady either and trip reading was 61.8mpg, I was quite pleased with that.
Puma St line X 125 MHEV with power tailgate.
NFFC
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 3:28 pm

Post by NFFC »

Vin wrote: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:01 pm Done a 120 round trip last weekend not a fun fast drive but not driving like an old lady either and trip reading was 61.8mpg, I was quite pleased with that.
That’s great mate, what mode were you in normal ?
Ford Puma ST Line Red 125bhp
potentialbuyer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 12:27 pm

Post by potentialbuyer »

Update :

Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 21.03.43.png

BjNtheBear
Posts: 531
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:46 pm
Location: Lanarkshire

Post by BjNtheBear »

I've done 1035 miles, latest fuel report shows 57.4mpg, on a recent trip of around 180 miles trip was showing 60.6mpg 😲 amazing, 3/4 of the tank was the "dreaded" E10 fuel as well.
Car's a manual 155 normal mode.

Screenshot_20210902-110444_FordPass.jpg

Ford Puma ST Line X 155 Desert Island Blue
Post Reply